On mr Roy Harrod's new argument for induction

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (35):221-224 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/ix.35.221

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Discussions: New Argument for Induction: Reply to Professor Popper.Roy Harrod - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):309-312.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Karl R. Popper. Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Karl R. Popper.M. Bunge - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (2):154-157.
Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
The Open Universe an Argument for Indeterminism /Karl R. Popper. --. --.Karl Raimund Popper & William Warren Bartley - 1982 - Rowman and Littlefield, C1982.
Scientific Induction.Ray Scott Percival - 2006 - In A. C. Grayling, Andrew Pyle & Naomi Goulder (eds.), The Continuum encyclopedia of British philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum. pp. 1619-1622.
Karl R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965 (1963), 55s.) Pp. xiii+417.Peter Achinstein - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#335,373)

6 months
11 (#334,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references