The Sceptical Crisis and the Rise of Modern Philosophy, III

Review of Metaphysics 7 (3):499 - 510 (1954)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main battles of the Pyrrhonists were not fought with Gassendi, but with the later followers of Cartesian rationalism. Pascal saw the Pyrrhonian view as invincible; all science was in doubt, if we appealed only to rational evidence. No axioms or principles could be found which were indubitable, and all one could conclude was that "Pyrrhonism is true." As long as there are dogmatists, the Pyrrhonists will conquer. Reason forces one to Pyrrhonism. Nature however refuses to let us doubt everything. Only through God's grace can we get out of this predicament of being sceptics by reason and dogmatists by nature, and only through the mysteries of faith can we be saved from the crise pyrrhonienne.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Philosophical Explorations 15 (3):277-289.
Scepticism without Theory.Michael Williams - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 41 (3):547 - 588.
Truth and Error.Pravas Jivan Chaudhury - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (4):569 - 573.
On doubt.Vilém Flusser - 2014 - Minneapolis, Minnesota: Univocal. Edited by Rodrigo Maltez Novaes, Siegfried Zielinski & Rainer Guldin.
Investigative and Suspensive Scepticism.Filip Grgić - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):653-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
27 (#833,502)

6 months
4 (#1,269,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references