Abstract

This paper attempts to show through the modern literature that Social Trinitarianism is a more plausible explanation of the Trinity than Latin Trinitarianism. It will look at ST's solution to Trinitarian procession and LT's likeness to modalism. It will focus on essays written in response to Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos and shall offer a new way to speak of the Trinity through the combining of the methodology proposed by H. E. Barber and Richard Swinburne’s view of necessity and procession.