One machinery, multiple cognitive states: The value of the AIM model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):993-994 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The AIM model represents an original and comprehensive example of how changes in conscious states can be reconciled with specific neurophysiological factors. However, further elucidation of the biological parameters necessary to define a specific space-state relationship should be considered. [Hobson et al.; Solms].

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The waking-to-dreaming continuum and the effects of emotion.Ernest Hartmann - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):947-950.
Dream production is not chaotic.Mauro Mancia - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):967-968.
Dreaming is not a non-conscious electrophysiologic state.J. F. Pagel - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):984-988.
Sleep, not Rem sleep, is the Royal road to dreams.Alexander A. Borbély & Lutz Wittmann - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):911-912.
New multiplicities of dreaming and REMing.Harry T. Hunt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):953-955.
How does the dreaming brain explain the dreaming mind?John S. Antrobus - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):904-907.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#536,733)

6 months
13 (#268,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references