A New Contact Paradox

Foundations of Science 29 (3):803-820 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a well-known variety of contact paradoxes which are significantly linked to topology. The aim of this paper is to present a new paradox concerning contact with bodies composed of a denumerable infinity of parts. This paradox establishes the logical necessity, in a Newtonian context, of contact forces (herein called “phantom forces”) that violate what is probably our most basic causal intuition, embodied in what I call the Principle of Influence: any force exerted on a body B induces (causes) change of movement of B or (inclusive disjunction) the emergence of internal forces in B. However, the above paradox can be made strictly compatible with a Newtonian framework by introducing phantom forces as ideal elements in the Hilbert sense, though it will be seen that this does not solve all the problems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A physical model of Zeno's dichotomy.Leonard Angel - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):347-358.
Russell’s Paradox and Free Zig Zag Solutions.Ludovica Conti - 2020 - Foundations of Science 28 (1):1-19.
Russell’s Paradox and Free Zig Zag Solutions.Ludovica Conti - 2020 - Foundations of Science 28 (1):185-203.
Newtonian Forces.Jessica Wilson - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):173-205.
Some paradoxes of infinity revisited.Yaroslav Sergeyev - 2022 - Mediterranian Journal of Mathematics 19:143.
Evolutionary and Newtonian Forces.Christopher Hitchcock & Joel D. Velasco - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1:39-77.
Are tachyon causal paradoxes solved?Réjean Girard & Louis Marchildon - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (6):535-548.
What the Tortoise Said to Achilles: Lewis Carroll’s paradox in terms of Hilbert arithmetic.Vasil Penchev - 2021 - Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal (Elsevier: SSRN) 13 (22):1-32.
Technology and Goodman’s Paradox.Ingemar Nordin - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (3):345-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-14

Downloads
37 (#610,630)

6 months
11 (#347,933)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradoxes.R. M. Sainsbury - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (251):106-111.
A beautiful supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
Some New Infinity Puzzles.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (3):1093-1099.

View all 9 references / Add more references