Can Democratic “We” Be Thought? The Politics of Negativity in Nihilistic Times

Philosophies 9 (2):52 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I attempt to systematically reconstruct Theodor Adorno’s account of the relationship between the processes of authoritarian subject formation and the processes of political formation of the democratic common will. Undertaking a reading that brings Adorno into dialogue with contemporary philosophical perspectives, the paper asks the question of whether it is possible to think of a “democratic We” in nihilistic times. In order to achieve this aim, I will analyze in reverse the modifications that the concept of narcissism has undergone, from Adorno’s use of it to account for the symbolic obstacles to the formation of democratic subjectivities after the Holocaust, to the initial formulations of Freudian psychoanalysis. Finally, I will attempt to outline an affirmative answer to the initial question, formulating the potentials and merits of what I will call a politics of negativity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-24

Downloads
23 (#915,501)

6 months
8 (#533,737)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Agustín Lucas Prestifilippo
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

References found in this work

Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
Outside ethics.Raymond Geuss - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):29–53.
Adorno’s politics: Theory and praxis in Germany’s 1960s.Fabian Freyenhagen - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (9):0191453714545198.
Education for maturity and responsibility.Theodor W. Adorno & Hellmut Becker - 1999 - History of the Human Sciences 12 (3):21-34.

Add more references