‘Justice in Health or Justice (and Health)?’—How (Not) to Apply a Theory of Justice to Health

Public Health Ethics 11 (3):336-345 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some theorists, especially egalitarians, seek to ‘apply’ theories of justice to a specific area or good, such as health, and assess the distribution of that good at the bar of justice. On the one hand, this is understandable, given that egalitarians are often interested in making policy recommendations and these would have to be area-specific. On the other hand, it is surprising in light of the fact that theories of justice normally envisage the ‘total package of goods’ or an overall good as the distribuendum. This article aims to show that this approach is problematic at least in the area of health.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-26

Downloads
70 (#300,634)

6 months
12 (#298,890)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adina Preda
Trinity College, Dublin

Citations of this work

From Sufficient Health to Sufficient Responsibility.Ben Davies & Julian Savulescu - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (3):423-433.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality and priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.
Just Emissions.Simon Caney - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (4):255-300.
Is health care (still) special?Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3):342–361.
Intrinsicalism and conditionalism about final value.Jonas Olson - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):31-52.

View all 14 references / Add more references