- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Infinitesimal method and judgment of origin
Kant E-Prints 16 (2):185-199 (2021)
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to investigate the relation between Cohen's approach to differential calculus and his doctrine of pure thinking. We claim that Cohen's logic of origin is firmly based on his interpretation of infinitesimal analysis. More precisely, the transcendental method, when applied to differential calculus, reveals the productive capacity of thinking expressed by the judgment of origin.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
From Nichts to Etwas: Transcendental Method and Negation in Hermann Cohen’s Idealism.Hernán Pringe - 2022 - In Gregory S. Moss (ed.), The Being of Negation in Post-Kantian Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 453-468.
Hermann Cohen’s Principle of the Infinitesimal Method: A Defense.Scott Edgar - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):440-470.
Constructive Thinking in the Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen.Valery Ye Semyonov - 2022 - Kantian Journal 41 (3):76-101.
The Role of Mathematics in Deleuze’s Critical Engagement with Hegel.Simon Duffy - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):563 – 582.
Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies Between Leibniz and his Contemporaries. [REVIEW]Françoise Monnoyeur-Broitman - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):527-528.
Hermann Cohen's "Charakteristik der Ethik Maimunis": A Reconstructive Reading of Maimonides' Ethics.Almut Sh Bruckstein - 1992 - Dissertation, Temple University
Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond. [REVIEW]Mikhail G. Katz & David Sherry - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):571-625.
Situation Calculus の非標準モデルについて.Hiratsuka Satoshi Fusaoka Akira - 2002 - Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 17:557-564.
The Mathematics of Deleuze’s differential logic and metaphysics.Simon B. Duffy - 2006 - In Simon Duffy (ed.), Virtual Mathematics: the logic of difference. Clinamen.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-10-14
Downloads
25 (#855,460)
6 months
6 (#809,985)
2021-10-14
Downloads
25 (#855,460)
6 months
6 (#809,985)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
“Das” Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte: ein Kapitel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik.Hermann Cohen - 2013 - Berlin: Dümmler.
The philosophy of Solomon Maimon.Samuel Hugo Bergman - 1967 - Jerusalem,: Magnes Press, Hebrew University.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-jhg8z dc2