Comments on Alvin Plantinga's “games scientists play”

Abstract

Plantinga starts by outlining an apparent conflict between certain claims of methodologically naturalist science and Christian faith. The conflict is not a logical contradiction, at least not once we are dealing with the more cautious “minus” versions of the doctrines, but some weaker relation such as the rational impossibility of believing both. 2. Scepticism about Simonian science..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Simonian Science.David Diekema & Patrick McDonald - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (1):74-93.
The Real Conflict Between Science and Religion: Alvin Plantinga’s Ignoratio Elenchi.Herman Philipse - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):87--110.
Critical Notice of Alvin Plantinga's Where the Conflict Really Lies.Greg Janzen - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):291-295.
Methodology of Augustinian Science.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#857,659)

6 months
26 (#124,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references