The child's right to bodily integrity and autonomy: A conceptual analysis

Clinical Ethics 19 (4):307-315 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely accepted that children enjoy some form of a right to bodily integrity. However, there is little agreement about the precise nature and scope of this right. This paper offers a conceptual analysis of the child's right to bodily integrity, in order to further elucidate the relationship between the child's right to bodily integrity and considerations of autonomy. Following a discussion of Leif Wenar's work on the structure and justification of rights, I first explain how the adult's right to bodily integrity can be distilled into separate elements that may plausibly be justified by different moral considerations. In particular, I claim that this analysis suggests that whilst the adult's right to bodily integrity is not wholly reducible to bodily autonomy, autonomy nonetheless remains entwined with our understanding of this right in a number of ways. On the basis of this discussion, I go on to outline three important complexities that arise when we consider the child's right to bodily integrity, before particularly focusing on the question of how third parties should determine whether or not to perform a physical interference upon a child who lacks decision-making capacity. Here, I raise some objections to Earp and Mazor's recent attempts to answer this question, before briefly defending an ‘autonomy-based interests’ account of permissible interference, an account that shares in what I take to be the spirit, if not the precise letter, of these earlier views.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Child’s Right to Bodily Integrity: When Is the Right Infringed?Joseph Mazor - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (4):451-465.
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen, Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.
From Bodily Rights to Personal Rights.Thomas Douglas - 2020 - In Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken & Mart Susi, The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights. Cambridge University Press. pp. 378-384.
Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision.Wim Dekkers, Cor Hoffer & Jean-Pierre Wils - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):179-191.
Can Consent Be Irrevocable?Angela Sun - forthcoming - Philosophers' Imprint.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-27

Downloads
74 (#293,655)

6 months
18 (#145,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Pugh
University of Oxford

References found in this work

Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
The Nature of Rights.Leif Wenar - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3):223-252.
Free Agency and Self-Worth.Paul Benson - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (12):650-668.
The Foundation of the Child's Right to an Open Future.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (4):522-538.

View all 23 references / Add more references