Vaught's conjecture for modules over a serial ring

Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):155-163 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is proved that Vaught's conjecture is true for modules over an arbitrary countable serial ring. It follows from the structural result that every module with few models over a (countable) serial ring is ω-stable

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,706

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Model theory of modules over a serial ring.Paul C. Eklof & Ivo Herzog - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72 (2):145-176.
ℵ0-categorical modules.Walter Baur - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):213 - 220.
$aleph_0$-Categorical Modules.Walter Baur - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):213-220.
On the strong Martin conjecture.Masanori Itai - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):862-875.
Reverse mathematics and semisimple rings.Huishan Wu - 2022 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 61 (5):769-793.
Model-theoretic aspects of Σ-cotorsion modules.Pedro Guil Asensio & Ivo Herzog - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 146 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#421,826)

6 months
9 (#450,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Model theory of modules.Martin Ziegler - 1984 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 26 (2):149-213.
Model theory of modules over a serial ring.Paul C. Eklof & Ivo Herzog - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 72 (2):145-176.

Add more references