Aesthetics and adjudication: Intersubjective requirements and juridical judgment

Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (2):165-178 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01207374

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Susan L. Feagin: Reading with Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation.Sarah E. Worth & Jennifer McMahon Railey - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4):579-581.
Externalization is common to all value judgments, and norms are motivating because of their intersubjective grounding.Carme Isern-Mas & Antoni Gomila - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:21-21.
Beyond intersubjective validity : recent empirical investigations into the nature of aesthetic judgment.Florian Cova - 2018 - In Florian Cova & Sébastien Réhault (eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Aesthetic Value, Intersubjectivity and the Absolute Conception of the World.G. Anthony Bruno - 2009 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (3).
Rationality and the basis of the value judgment.Ludwig Grünberg - 1978 - Journal of Value Inquiry 12 (2):126-133.
Artefacts of Legal Inquiry: The Value of Imagination in Adjudication.Maksymilian Del Mar - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
Judgment and radicalism.Peter Barnett - 1970 - Journal of Value Inquiry 4 (3):204-211.
On justifying enforced requirements: A reply to Baier. [REVIEW]David Lyons - 1975 - Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1):42-47.
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross‐cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment.Florian Cova, Christopher Y. Olivola, Edouard Machery, Stephen Stich, David Rose, Mario Alai, Adriano Angelucci, Renatas Berniūnas, Emma E. Buchtel, Amita Chatterjee, Hyundeuk Cheon, In-Rae Cho, Daniel Cohnitz, Vilius Dranseika, Ángeles E. Lagos, Laleh Ghadakpour, Maurice Grinberg, Ivar Hannikainen, Takaaki Hashimoto, Amir Horowitz, Evgeniya Hristova, Yasmina Jraissati, Veselina Kadreva, Kaori Karasawa, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Kim, Minwoo Lee, Carlos Mauro, Masaharu Mizumoto, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Jorge Ornelas, Barbara Osimani, Carlos Romero, Alejandro Rosas, Massimo Sangoi, Andrea Sereni, Sarah Songhorian, Paulo Sousa, Noel Struchiner, Vera Tripodi, Naoki Usui, Alejandro V. del Mercado, Giorgio Volpe, Hrag A. Vosgerichian, Xueyi Zhang & Jing Zhu - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (3):317-338.
Legislation and adjudication.Fernando Atria - 2012 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#606,359)

6 months
6 (#812,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan M. Purviance
University of Toledo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Legal theory, legal interpretation, and judicial review.David O. Brink - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):105-148.
“Protestant” interpretation and social practices.Gerald Postema - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (3):283 - 319.
Interpretation and the social reality of law.Dennis Goldford - 1991 - Social Epistemology 5 (1):6 – 15.

Add more references