Towards an imaginal dialogue: archetypal symbols between Eastern Orthodox Christianity and Islam

Approaching Religion 6 (2):81-95 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for a dialogue between religious traditions based on art, in order to complement the dominant channels that rely on conceptual meanings. Building on a theoretical framework of post-Jungian archetypal psychology – as developed by James Hillman and Henry Corbin – we propose that the utility of such a dialogue inheres in the notion of an imaginal realm, or mundus imaginalis. In the first part of the paper we highlight three key features of this notion: the distinction between the imaginal and the imaginary; the significance of a culturally differentiated collective unconscious; and a reflection of the imaginal in practice rather than conceptually. We emphasize the materiality of sacred symbols that emerge from the imaginal realm. In the second part, we illustrate the importance of two archetypal symbols: the fish and the chalice. The significance of these symbols in history and in the practices of communities of believers is discussed. Thirdly, we discuss specific features of the dialogue emerging from these ubiquitous archetypal symbols.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-08

Downloads
16 (#1,199,504)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Poetic for Sociology: Toward a Logic of Discovery for the Human Sciences.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1978 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (3):380-381.
The Great Mother.Erich Neumann & R. Manheim - 1955 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (2):354-356.

Add more references