Retractions: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Nature Index (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep the literature healthy, researchers want to avoid retractions at all costs.

Other Versions

original Vuong, Quan-Hoang (2020) "Retractions: the good, the bad, and the ugly". LSE Impact of Social Sciences 2020(2):1-4
reprint Vuong, Quan-Hoang (2020) "Retractions: the good, the bad, and the ugly".

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Retractions: the good, the bad, and the ugly.Quan-Hoang Vuong - 2020 - LSE Impact of Social Sciences 2020 (2):1-4.
Empirical developments in retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-11

Downloads
508 (#55,915)

6 months
115 (#49,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Quan-Hoang Vuong
Phenikaa University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Retractions: the good, the bad, and the ugly.Quan-Hoang Vuong - 2020 - LSE Impact of Social Sciences 2020 (2):1-4.

Add more references