- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can Parfit’s Appeal to Incommensurabilities Block the Continuum Argument for the Repugnant Conclusion?
In Paul Bowman & Katharina Berndt Rasmussen (eds.), Studies on Climate Ethics and Future Generations, Vol. 1. Institute for Futures Studies (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Repugnant Conclusion.Joakim Sandberg - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 247–248.
Incommensurability, the sequence argument, and the Pareto principle.Gustaf Arrhenius & H. Orri Stefánsson - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3395-3411.
Studies on Climate Ethics and Future Generations, Vol. 1.Paul Bowman & Katharina Berndt Rasmussen (eds.) - 2019 - Institute for Futures Studies.
What Should We Do About Future Generations?Yew-Kwang Ng - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):235.
Studies on Climate Ethics and Future Generations, Vol. 2.Paul Bowman & Katharina Berndt Rasmussen (eds.) - 2020 - Institute for Futures Studies.
Classical utilitarianism and Parfit's repugnant conclusion: A reply to McMahan.R. I. Sikora - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):128-133.
Getting Personal: The Intuition of Neutrality Reinterpreted.Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2020 - In Paul Bowman & Katharina Berndt Rasmussen (eds.), Studies on Climate Ethics and Future Generations, Vol. 2. Institute for Futures Studies.
Future People, the All Affected Principle, and the Limits of the Aggregation: Model of Democracy.”.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - In J. Josefsson D. Egonsson (ed.), Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
Four brides for twelve brothers - How to Dutch book a group of fully rational players.Luc Bovens - 2006 - Hommage a Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
Intransitivity and future generations: Debunking Parfit's mere addition paradox.Kai M. A. Chan - 2003 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):187–200.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-06-07
Downloads
23 (#943,106)
6 months
4 (#1,252,858)
2021-06-07
Downloads
23 (#943,106)
6 months
4 (#1,252,858)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A dilemma for lexical and Archimedean views in population axiology.Elliott Thornley - 2022 - Economics and Philosophy 38 (3):395-415.
References found in this work
Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents.Christian List & Philip Pettit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2