Cheating at coin tossing

Abstract

Arguments for A "fair" coin has probability 1/2. There is no physical probability attached to the coin, we can cheat on each toss (by sufficient control). My aim: The coin toss is fine-grained deterministic, but coarsgrained random

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Kyburg on random designators.Isaac Levi - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):635-642.
No Double-Halfer Embarrassment: A Reply to Titelbaum.Joel Pust - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (3):346-354.
The Sleeping Beauty Controversy.Peter Winkler - 2017 - The American Mathematical Monthly 124:589-587.
Should the probabilities count?Katharina Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.
Using biased coins as oracles.Toby Ord & Tien D. Kieu - 2009 - International Journal of Unconventional Computing 5:253-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-20

Downloads
49 (#450,040)

6 months
49 (#102,202)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raidl Eric
University Tübingen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references