On the representation of modality

Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):357 - 379 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that noun complement modality cannot be treated as dependent on the meanings of lexical embedding predicates or of abstract performatives. Using two types of complement modalities, I show that their meanings and restrictions remain distinct and invariable regardless of the meanings of their embedding predicates. Then, using embedding predicates that can take both types of modalities, I show that the embedding predicates retain their meanings, regardless of the different modalities of their complements, and they can undergo deletions requiring their identity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#427,156)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The semantics of English imperatives.Martin Huntley - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (2):103 - 133.

Add more citations