- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An adverbial meinongian theory
Analysis 39 (March):75-81 (1979)
Abstract
A fundamental assumption of Alexius Meinong's 1904 Theory of Objects is the act-content-object analysis of psychological experiences. I suggest that Meinong's theory need not be based on this analysis, but that an adverbial theory might suffice. I then defend the adverbial alternative against an objection raised by Roderick Chisholm, and conclude by presenting an apparently more serious objection based on a paradox discovered by Romane Clark.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Meinong, Defective Objects, and (Psycho-)Logical Paradox.William J. Rapaport - 1982 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 18 (1):17-39.
Sellars and the adverbial theory of sensation.Thomas Vinci - 1981 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):199-217.
Meinong, Defective Objects, and (Psycho-)Logical Paradox.William J. Rapaport - 1982 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 18 (1):17-39.
In Defence of the Adverbial Theory of Experience.Michael Pendlebury - 1998 - In William J. Rapaport & Francesco Orilia (eds.), Thought, Language, and Ontology, Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castaneda. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 95-106.
Symposium: The adverbial theory of perception. On the adverbial analysis of visual experience.Frank Jackson - 1975 - Metaphilosophy 6 (2):127–135.
The adverbial theory of numbers: some clarifications.Joongol Kim - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3981-4000.
Modal Meinongianism, Russell’s Paradox, and the Language/Metalanguage Distinction.Maciej Sendłak - 2013 - Polish Journal of Philosophy (2):63-78.
La théorie des complexes et des assomptions de Meinong (I).Bertrand Russell & Bruno Langlet - 2020 - Philosophie 146 (3):11-25.
Meinong's Theory of Non-Existent Objects.Andrew Kenneth Jorgensen - 2002 - Dissertation, Temple University
The adverbial theory of the objects of sensation.Wilfrid Sellars - 1975 - Metaphilosophy 6 (April):144-160.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
141 (#158,591)
6 months
12 (#294,748)
2009-01-28
Downloads
141 (#158,591)
6 months
12 (#294,748)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The determinable–determinate relation can’t save adverbialism.Alex Grzankowski - 2018 - Analysis 78 (1):45-52.
Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be Computing.William J. Rapaport - 2012 - International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2 (1):32-71.
Logical foundations for belief representation.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Cognitive Science 10 (4):371-422.
Neo-Meinongian neo-Russellians.Seyed N. Mousavian - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):229-259.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-9l5tj dc2