A Triage Theory of Grading: The Good, the Bad, and the Middling

Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):347–372 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay presents and defends a triage theory of grading: An item to be graded should get full credit if and only if it is clearly or substantially correct, minimal credit if and only if it is clearly or substantially incorrect, and partial credit if and only if it is neither of the above; no other (intermediate) grades should be given. Details on how to implement this are provided, and further issues in the philosophy of grading (reasons for and against grading, grading on a curve, and the subjectivity of grading) are discussed

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-26

Downloads
977 (#21,784)

6 months
102 (#59,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William J. Rapaport
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

The philosophy of computer science.Raymond Turner - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Unsolvable Problems and Philosophical Progress.William J. Rapaport - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (4):289 - 298.
A discourse on grading.Robert Paul Wolff - forthcoming - Philosophy of Education: Anthology.
Philosophy for Children and Other People.William J. Rapaport - 1987 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy (Summer):19-22.

Add more references