Implementation is Semantic Interpretation

The Monist 82 (1):109-130 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the computational notion of “implementation”? It is not individuation, instantiation, reduction, or supervenience. It is, I suggest, semantic interpretation.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00269662

DOI

10.5840/monist19998212

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Concrete Interpretation of Schopenhauer's Notion of the Will.H. Steinhauer - 1929 - The Monist 39 (2):161-169.
Facts, Events, and Semantic Emphasis in Causal Statements.Philip L. Peterson - 1994 - The Monist 77 (2):217-238.
The Pragmatic Interpretation of the Christian Dogma.Irving King - 1905 - The Monist 15 (2):248-261.
An Interpretation of Hegel’s Political Thought.Thomas N. Munson - 1964 - The Monist 48 (1):97-111.
The Religio-Historical Interpretation of the New Testament.Hermann Gunkel - 1903 - The Monist 13 (3):398-455.
Logistic and the Reduction of Mathematics to Logic.James Byrnie Shaw - 1916 - The Monist 26 (3):397-414.
Contemporary Uses of the Notion of ’Empire’.Danilo Zolo - 2007 - The Monist 90 (1):48-64.
The Capture Hypothesis of T. J. J. See.Henri Poincaré - 1912 - The Monist 22 (3):460-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
1,375 (#12,452)

6 months
145 (#31,296)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be Computing.William J. Rapaport - 2012 - International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2 (1):32-71.
What is a Simulation Model?Juan M. Durán - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (3):301-323.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references