Making sense of Day 1 of the Two New Sciences: Galileo’s Aristotelian-inspired agenda and his Jesuit readers

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):479-491 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.09.010

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Out of the margins: readers and the early modern (re-)emergence of mathematics.Kevin Gerard Tracey - forthcoming - Intellectual History Review.
Aspects of aristotelian statics in Galileo's dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Aspects of Aristotelian statics in Galileo's dynamics.J. De Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Renée Raphael. Reading Galileo: Scribal technologies and the two new sciences. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017, xii + 265 pp. ISBN: 9781421421773. [REVIEW]Enrico Giannetto - 2019 - Centaurus 61 (4):443-444.
Renée Raphael. Reading Galileo: Scribal Technology and the “Two New Sciences.” ix + 265 pp., figs., bibl., index. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. $54.95. [REVIEW]Abram Kaplan - 2018 - Isis 109 (2):397-398.
The paradox of conceptual novelty and Galileo's use of experiments.Maarten Dycvank - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
Galileo’s Two New Sciences as a Model of Reading Practice.Renée Raphael - 2016 - Journal of the History of Ideas 77 (4):539-565.
Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences.S. Leonelli - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):1-3.
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments.Maarten Van Dyck - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
Patterns of argumentation in Galileo's discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-04

Downloads
31 (#728,019)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Humanist Methods in Natural Philosophy: The Commonplace Book.Ann Blair - 1992 - Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (4):541-551.
The Textbook Tradition in Natural Philosophy 1600–1650.Patricia Reif - 1969 - Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (1):17.

View all 11 references / Add more references