Refusing Prenatal Diagnosis: The Meanings of Bioscience in a Multicultural World

Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (1):45-70 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the reasons women of diverse class, racial ethnic, national, and religious backgrounds give for their decisions not to accept an amniocentesis or, having accepted one, not to pursue an abortion after diagnosis of serious fetal disability. The narratives of refusers reveal conflicts and tensions between the universalizing rationality of biomedical interventions into pregnancy and the wider heterogeneous social frame work to which women respond in their decision-making processes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
12 (#1,366,369)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prenatal diagnosis: The irresistible rise of the ‘visible fetus’.Ilana Löwy - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47 (PB):290-299.
Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood.Susanne Brauer - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):45-54.
Ethical boundary work: Geneticization, philosophy and the social sciences.Adam M. Hedgecoe - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):305-309.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references