The Problem of Political Freedom

In The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Central to liberalism is the concept of political freedom. Revisionists wrongly claim that liberty has only instrumental value, but they do nevertheless contribute several cogent arguments relevant to the question of how the value of liberty is to be justified. The doctrine of the presumption of liberty and the thesis that liberty ‘just has’ intrinsic value are rightly rejected by revisionists, since neither can ground distinctions between different freedoms. Linguistic analysis is of limited use to the justification of the value of liberty, since distinctions between notions of freedom and unfreedom do not match normatively relevant distinctions. This book seeks to defend a liberal theory of limited government without resort to the mistaken premises of individualism, which it rejects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Another Look at the Revisionist Challenge to Liberty.Arudra V. Burra - 2016 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 14 (1).
The Justification of Freedom in John Stuart Mill. Reply to Some Criticism by Martha Nussbaum.David José Blanco Cortina - 2019 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (14):35-54.
Freedom, liberty, and property.Jonathan Wolff - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):345-357.
Four Conceptions of Freedom.Horacio Spector - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (6):780-808.
Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty.Lucas Swaine - 2018 - Political Theory 46 (3):405-425.
Mill’s Circle(s) of Liberty.Sven Ove Hansson - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):734-749.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
16 (#1,189,266)

6 months
13 (#256,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Raz
Columbia University

Citations of this work

Ambidextrous Lockeanism.Billy Christmas - 2020 - Economics and Philosophy 36 (2):193-215.
The All Affected Principle, and the weighting of votes.Kim Angell & Robert Huseby - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (4):366-381.
Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats and the Ethics of Self-Defense.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):585 - 622.
Parity versus Ignorance.Moritz Schulz - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):1183-1204.
Perfectionism for children, anti-perfectionism for adults.Tim Fowler - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3-4):305-323.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references