Comments on Guyer

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):489 – 496 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Before and in the Groundwork , Kant argues as follows for the validity of the moral law: we want to be free. Following the moral law is the only way to be free. So we should follow the moral law.1 The first premise of this syllogism is treated differently before and in the Groundwork . First Kant thought it an empirical fact that men want to be free and want it more than anything else.2 Later he sought an a priori argument showing that we ought to want to be free and are right in thinking it good.3 The former justification of the moral law is superior. When we look to “salvage the normative core of Kantian moral philosophy” (Guyer 445), we should turn to it. - So far Paul Guyer. It is evident that Guyer fails to describe Kant's thought in the Groundwork . It is equally clear that Kant never held the position Guyer claims he held before the Groundwork . (The quotations Guyer gives in support of his claim show this.) Therefore I shall not discuss Guyer's interpretation of Kant. Instead I shall consider the philosophical merits of the position he ascribes to the pre-critical Kant, and which he recommends as superior. We shall see that that position makes no sense. This indirectly addresses the interpretive question, as it is a reason against ascribing it to Kant.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,956

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on Guyer.Sebastian Rödl - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):489-496.
Comments on Guyer.Henry E. Allison - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):480 – 488.
Comments on Guyer.Allen W. Wood - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):465 – 479.
Some Hope for Kant's Groundwork III.Joe Saunders - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Skepticism in Kant's Groundwork.Owen Ware - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):375-396.
Some hope for Kant’s Groundwork III.Joe Saunders - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (9):2902-2929.
The phenomenological failure of groundwork III.Jeanine M. Grenberg - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):335 – 356.
Kant's Taxonomy of the Emotions.Kelly D. Sorensen - 2002 - Kantian Review 6:109-128.
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (review). [REVIEW]Robert B. Pippin - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1):138-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#332,178)

6 months
60 (#94,736)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references