Transcendental deduction of predicative structure in Kant and Brandom

Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):91-107 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fregean predicates applied to Fregean objects are merely defined by a `timeless' deductive order of sentences. They cannot provide sufficient structure in order to explain how names can refer to objects of intuition and how predicates can express properties of substances that change in time. Therefore, the accounts of Wilson and Quine, Prior and Brandom for temporal judgments fail — and a new reconstruction of Kant's transcendental logic, especially of the analogies of experience, is needed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-25

Downloads
322 (#91,179)

6 months
18 (#158,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Rödl
Universität Leipzig

Citations of this work

Chapter 7: A Disappearing World.Sheila Webb - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy of Education.
Chapter 7 A Disappearing World.Sheila Webb - 2020 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (6):1596-1614.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references