Structured Arguments and Their Aggregation: A Reply to Selinger

Argumentation 28 (3):395-399 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as ‘structured argumentation’. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one another

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argument Evaluation and Evidence.Douglas Walton - 2015 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Towards Computational Rhetoric.Floriana Grasso - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).
Revisiting unrestricted rebut and preferences in structured argumentation.Jesse Heyninck & Christian Straßer - 2016 - In Subbarao Kambhampati (ed.), Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Palo Alto, USA: AAAI Press / International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 1088--1092.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-01

Downloads
28 (#796,220)

6 months
10 (#398,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?