Against evaluator relativity: A response to Sen

Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):93-112 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evaluator relativity and consequential evaluation.Amartya Sen - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):113-132.
Sen on Justice and Rights: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Frances Kamm - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (1):82-104.
The relativity of injury.Jethro K. Lieberman - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (1):60-73.
The prajâpati test : Response to Amartya Sen.Marcel Hénaff - 2009 - In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Welfarism in moral theory.Andrew Moore & Roger Crisp - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):598 – 613.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#267,680)

6 months
9 (#433,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Metaethics After Moore.Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
The Moral Standing of the Market.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):1.
Two kinds of consequentialism.Michael Smith - 2009 - Philosophical Issues 19 (1):257-272.
A fault line in ethical theory.Shyam Nair - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):173-200.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references