The kind of research I am advocating belongs to a branch of inquiry that may be called" meta-interpretation," ie a study of interpretation of texts. The prefix" meta" underlines the fact that we are not concerned with explaining conflicts between philo-sophical ideas in general. This is, for example, what marxists are [Book Review]

In Gunnar Aspelin (ed.), Philosophical essays. Lund,: CWK Gleerup. pp. 175 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meta-ontology.Peter Van Inwagen - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):233--50.
Meta-Externalism vs Meta-Internalism in the Study of Reference.Daniel Cohnitz & Jussi Haukioja - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):475-500.
Meta-philosophy, Once Again.Kai Nielsen - 2012 - Philo 15 (1):55-96.
Soup, Harmony, and Disagreement.David B. Wong - 2020 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6 (2):139-155.
A catalogue of „delicate” ideas. [REVIEW]Doris Mironescu - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (2):407-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references