Kripke against Kripkenstein

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):241-248 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What was Saul Kripke’s personal stance on the sceptical challenge that he famously attributed to Ludwig Wittgenstein? It will be argued that despite his statements to the contrary, we can, in fact, outline at least a rough sketch of Kripke’s own views on the challenge and its aftermath on the basis of the remarks he left in the text. In summary, Kripke (a) rejected the sceptical solution to the challenge and (b) leaned towards a non-sceptical primitivist solution. If this is correct, it follows that there is a way in which Kripke's view makes his causal-historical picture of reference potentially able to solve the sceptical challenge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Horwich, meaning and Kripke's Wittgenstein.Alexander Miller - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):161-174.
In Defence of Kripkenstein: On Lewis’ Proposed Solution to the Sceptical Argument.John Newson Wright - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):603-621.
Kripke’s Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Paradox: A Trilemma for Davidson.Ali Hossein Khani - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (1):21–37.
Hoffman on Kripke's Wittgenstein.George Rudebusch - 1986 - Philosophical Research Archives 12:177-182.
What is the Sceptical Solution?Alexander Miller - 2020 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 8 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-06

Downloads
115 (#185,123)

6 months
77 (#77,280)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jaakko Reinikainen
Tampere University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references