Response Bias Correction in the Process Dissociation Procedure: Approaches, Assumptions, and Evaluation

Consciousness and Cognition 5 (1-2):232-254 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Buchner, Erdfelder, and Vaterrodt-Plunnecke (1995) advocated an exposition of the process dissociation procedure within the framework of multinomial modeling. Among the misleading aspects of this exposition is its tendency to obscure the overlap between processes. In contrast, clarifying these crucial interactions leads to a general classification of response bias corrections to the process dissociation procedure. This scheme, in which corrective models are classified on the basis of process interactions, clarifies the assumptions underlying previously proposed corrections. As an illustration of the framework, three such corrections are derived. These corrective models are evaluated by applying them to the data reported by Buchner et al. (1995). © 1996 Academic Press, Inc.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments?Axel Buchner & Werner Wippich - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (1-2):197-220.
Can We Resolve Contradictions between Process Dissociation Models?Nelson Cowan - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (1-2):255-259.
Memory, process-dissociation procedure In.L. L. Jacoby - 2009 - In Patrick Wilken, Timothy J. Bayne & Axel Cleeremans (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 430--432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#393,182)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?