American Philosophy Today

Review of Metaphysics 46 (4):717 - 745 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PERHAPS THE MOST STRIKING FEATURE of professional philosophy in North America at this historic juncture is its scope and scale. The historian Bruce Kuklick entitled his informative study of academic philosophy in the United States, The Rise of American Philosophy: 1860-1930, even though his book dealt only with the Department of Philosophy of Harvard University. This institution's prominence on the American philosophical scene in the early years of the century was such that this parochial-seeming narrowing of focus to one single department--with its half-dozen or so philosophers--was not totally absurd for the period at issue. But today it would certainly be so. The American Philosophical Association, to which most United States academic practitioners of the discipline belong, presently has more than eight thousand members, and the comprehensive Directory of American Philosophers for 1992-1993 lists well over ten thousand philosophers affiliated to colleges and universities in the United States and Canada. Admittedly, this profession is small potatoes compared with other academic enterprises; the Scientific Research Society Sigma XI currently has a membership of more than one hundred thousand scientists, and the Modern Language Association has more than thirty-two thousand members. All the same, a small town of not inconsiderable size could be populated exclusively with contemporary North American academic philosophers. To be sure, its demographics would be rather unusual. Only just under twenty percent would be women; and blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Americans would constitute just over one percent of the population. The social classes above and below the middle are underrepresented in this community, and a disproportionate fraction of its members comes from families of professional status. Moreover, for reasons that require a deeper sociological analysis than can be attempted here, the profession attracts a disproportionately larger fraction of Catholics, Jews, and immigrants.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow. [REVIEW]Donald A. Piatt - 1937 - Philosophical Review 46 (6):664-665.
American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow. [REVIEW]H. A. L. - 1936 - Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):109.
Latin American Philosophy Today.Jorge J. E. Gracia - 1988 - Philosophical Forum 20 (1-2):1-158.
American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow. [REVIEW]A. L. H. - 1936 - Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):109-110.
American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow.Henry A. Lucks - 1936 - New Scholasticism 10 (3):292-294.
American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow. [REVIEW]W. H. C. Eddy - 1940 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):268.
Introduction, latin-american philosophy today.Jorge J. E. Gracia - 1988 - Philosophical Forum 20 (1-2):4-32.
American Philosophy Today and Tomorrow. [REVIEW]Robert Marshak - 1936 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 5 (2):269-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
29 (#774,799)

6 months
2 (#1,685,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Rescher
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Philosophical Diversity and Disagreement.Bob Plant - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):567-591.
On the Domain of Metaphilosophy.Bob Plant - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (1-2):3-24.
Rescher and Objective Pragmatism.Cheryl Misak - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):25-33.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references