On t and u, and what they can do

Analysis 70 (4):673-676 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-17

Downloads
142 (#158,754)

6 months
9 (#511,775)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes.Edwin Mares & Francesco Paoli - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):439-469.
What Is an Inconsistent Truth Table?Zach Weber, Guillermo Badia & Patrick Girard - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):533-548.
Can u do that?J. Beall, G. Priest & Z. Weber - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):280-285.
Categoricity Problem for LP and K3.Selcuk Kaan Tabakci - 2024 - Studia Logica 112 (6):1373-1407.

Add more citations

References found in this work

In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Spandrels of truth.J. C. Beall - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Spandrels of truth.Jc Beall - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):284-286.
Universal Logic.Ross Brady - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):544-547.

View all 10 references / Add more references