The Legitimacy of Doubt

Review of Metaphysics 13 (2):226 - 234 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is the object of the present paper to undertake a logical inquiry into one particular kind of evidence that has been taken to be capable of furnishing a rational warrant for doubt. The line of thought at issue finds its classic expression in the case for doubt argued by Descartes in the first of his Meditations on First Philosophy. Descartes' argument is as follows

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evil Demon Hypothesis and Its Position in Descartes' System of Thought.Seyyed Mostafa Shahraeeni & Azizeh Zirak Barugi - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 7 (13):47-68.
The Form of Descartes’ Method of Doubt.Patrick Brissey - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (2):233-249.
Doubts about "Descartes' self-doubt".James M. Humber - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (2):253-258.
The Limits of Cartesian Doubt.Eric Palmer - 1997 - Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4:1-20.
Rola wątpliwości w filozofii Kartezjusza.Michał Orzechowski - 2010 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica 23:35-60.
Descartes and Skepticism.Marjorie Grene - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 52 (3):553 - 571.
Cabbage à la Descartes.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2016 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3:609-637.
Why It Doesn’t Matter I’m Not Insane.Andrew Russo - 2011 - Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):157-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
24 (#919,459)

6 months
7 (#740,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Rescher
University of Pittsburgh

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references