Can Atheism Be Epistemically Responsible When So Many People Believe in God?

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):181--198 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nowadays the argument for the existence of God based on the common consent of mankind is taken to be so bad that contemporary atheists do not even bother to mention it. And it seems very few theists think that the argument is worth defending. In this paper I shall argue to the contrary: not only is the argument better than usually thought, but widespread belief in God constitutes a prima facie defeater for every reasonable atheist.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Faith and Reason.Russell Blackford & Udo Schüklenk - 2013 - In Russell Blackford & Udo Schüklenk, 50 Great Myths About Atheism. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 131–145.
Praying to stop being an atheist.T. J. Mawson - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):173 - 186.
God, God* and God'.Graham Oppy - 2004 - In Anthony Fisher & Hayden Ramsay, Faith and Reason: Friends or Foes in a New Millennium? ATF Press. pp. 171-186.
Nonbelief as Support for Atheism.Theodore M. Drange - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 36:59-64.
Wagering Against Divine Hiddenness.Elizabeth Jackson - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (4):85-108.
How to Be a Very Friendly Atheist Indeed.Francis Jonbäck - 2015 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 20 (1):65-72.
Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism.Matthew Braddock - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (3):189-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-10

Downloads
2,408 (#5,157)

6 months
102 (#63,841)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism.Matthew Braddock - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (3):189-210.
Nontraditional Arguments for Theism.Chad A. McIntosh - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):1-14.
Common Consent Arguments for Belief in God.Marcus Hunt - 2022 - Dialogue: A Journal of Philosophy and Religion (58):17-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Peer disagreement and higher order evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb, Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
The Problem of Political Authority.Michael Huemer - 2012 - New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
The Ethics of Belief.William Clifford - 2000 - In Brian Davies, Philosophy of religion: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references