Foreknowledge and Fatalism : Why Divine Timelessness Doesn’t Help

In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 253-274 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues that divine timelessness is at best irrelevant and at worst counterproductive for addressing the problem of foreknowledge and future contingents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom. [REVIEW]Gary Mar - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 45 (3):606-607.
Introduction.Patrick Todd & John Martin Fischer - 2015 - In John Martin Fischer & Patrick Todd (eds.), Freedom, Fatalism, and Foreknowledge. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 01-38.
Contra Tooley: Divine Foreknowledge is Possible.Elijah Hess - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (2):165-172.
Freedom, Fatalism, and Foreknowledge.John Martin Fischer & Patrick Todd (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-01

Downloads
400 (#69,459)

6 months
142 (#29,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Rhoda
Christian Theological Seminary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Ontological Dependence.Tuomas E. Tahko & E. J. Lowe - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Thought.C. D. Broad - 1923 - Paterson, N.J.,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
God, Time, and Knowledge.William Hasker - 1989 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references