Research and Reasons: In Defense of the Common Rule’s Preclusionary Statement

&
American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):67-70 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Common Rule requires institutional review boards (IRBs) to determine whether “(r)isks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2024.2441723

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Research and Reasons: In Defense of the Common Rule’s Preclusionary Statement.Rosamond Rhodes Olivia Blanchard Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):67-70.
The common rule's ‘reasonable person’ standard for informed consent.Jacob Greenblum & Ryan Hubbard - 2018 - Bioethics 33 (2):274-277.
What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.
Towards a balanced approach to identifying conflicts of interest faced by institutional review boards.Sharon Kaur & Sujata Balan - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (5):341-361.
The Protectors and the Protected: What Regulators and Researchers Can Learn from IRB Members and Subjects.Ann Freeman Cook, Helena Hoas & Jane Clare Joyner - 2013 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 3 (1):51-65.
Institutional review boards and human subjects research.Ccco Occcccocccoc Occccccooccccc Coco Occ Coo - 1984 - Bioethics Reporter 1 (1).
Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.Amy L. McGuire & Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W1 – W2.
Histories of mistrust and protectionism: Disadvantaged minority groups and human-subject research policies.Justin M. List - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):53 – 56.
Democratic Deliberation and the Ethical Review of Human Subjects Research.Govind Persad - 2014 - In I. Glenn Cohen & Holly Fernandez Lynch (eds.), Human Subjects Research Regulation: Perspectives on the Future. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp. 157-72.
A framework for risk-benefit evaluations in biomedical research.Annette Rid & David Wendler - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-30

Downloads
1 (#1,946,279)

6 months
1 (#1,890,996)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosamond Rhodes
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references