- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Unsafe presumptions in clinical research
American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):49 – 51 (2002)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Does Uncle Sam Really Want You?: A Response to “Rethinking Research Ethics” by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB5:1).Howard Trachtman - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W22-W23.
Some questionable premises about research ethics.Ruth Macklin - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):29 – 31.
Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.Amy L. McGuire & Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W1 – W2.
Histories of mistrust and protectionism: Disadvantaged minority groups and human-subject research policies.Justin M. List - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):53 – 56.
Clinical ethics versus clinical research.Paul S. Appelbaum & Charles W. Lidz - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):53 – 55.
Pragmatism and virtue ethics in clinical research.Daniel Goldberg - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):43 – 45.
Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):42 – 44.
Commentary: In Search of Medical Ethics and Its Foundation with Rosamond Rhodes.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (3):429-436.
"The Human Microbiome: Ethical, Legal, and Social Concerns" edited by Rosamond Rhodes, Nada Gligorov, and Abraham Paul Schwab. [REVIEW]Nicolae Morar - 2014 - Environmental Philosophy 11 (2):362-366.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
38 (#593,784)
6 months
11 (#347,933)
2009-01-28
Downloads
38 (#593,784)
6 months
11 (#347,933)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.Susanne Rebers, Neil K. Aaronson, Flora E. van Leeuwen & Marjanka K. Schmidt - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-11.
Research With Controlled Drugs: Why and Why Not? Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs”.Michael H. Andreae, Evelyn Rhodes, Tyler Bourgoise, George M. Carter, Robert S. White, Debbie Indyk, Henry Sacks & Rosamond Rhodes - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):1-3.
References found in this work
Bioethics: a return to fundamentals.Bernard Gert - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Charles M. Culver & K. Danner Clouser.
Cynthia's dilemma: Consenting to heroin prescription.Louis C. Charland - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):37-47.
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals.Henry S. Richardson, Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver & K. Danner Clouser - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (5):36.
Review of Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. [REVIEW]William G. Bartholome - 1988 - Ethics 98 (3):605-606.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2