MacFarlane on relative truth

Philosophical Issues 16 (1):88–100 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John MacFarlane has made relativism popular again. Focusing just on his original discussion, I argue that the data he uses to motivate the position do not, in fact, motivatie it at all. Many of the points made here have since been made, independently, by Hermann Cappelen and John Hawthorne, in their book Relativism and Monadic Truth.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
882 (#25,477)

6 months
130 (#40,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Kimberly Heck
Brown University

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Naming and necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.

View all 30 references / Add more references