Proof of a quantum mechanical nonlocal influence

Foundations of Physics 15 (3):303-317 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First it is proved that, in a deterministic theory, Malus' law requires that, if a photon is successively transmitted by two polarizers with appropriately chosen settings, the first transmission influences a hidden variable (co-) determining the second one. We derive from this that in an ideal EPR experiment (giving the result predicted by quantum mechanics for two correlated photons transmitted by two polarizers with suitably chosen settings) there has to be a nonlocal influence from the “first” transmission interaction to the second. Subsequently we argue that we can abandon determinism as an assumption so that the locality hypothesis is in any case untenable if the predictions of quantum mechanics are all correct

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
96 (#233,363)

6 months
11 (#337,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Special relativity and determinism.C. W. Rietdijk - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (4):598-609.
Locality and reality.Henry P. Stapp - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (9-10):767-795.
Proof of a retroactive influence.C. W. Rietdijk - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):615-628.

View all 6 references / Add more references