Expert evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings

In Helen Reece (ed.), Law and science. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 175 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

""The" Ultimate Issue" Problem in the Canadian Criminal Justice System.Marc Nesca - 2009 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (1):11.
Renegotiating forensic cultures: Between law, science and criminal justice.Paul Roberts - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):47-59.
Rethinking Criminal Law. [REVIEW]Andrew Botterell - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (1):93-112.
Rawls Revisited: Can International Criminal Law Exist?Kirsten J. Fisher - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 (2):407-420.
Miscarriage of jstice.Sally Serena Ramage - 2017 - Criminal Law News 105:02-28.
An English Daubert? Law, Forensic Science and Epistemic Deference.Tony Ward - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 15:26-36.
R v H [2015] A CriticalAnalysis.Sally Ramage - 2015 - Criminal Law News 80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references