Transferring Moral Responsibility for Technological Hazards: The Case of GMOs in Agriculture

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (5):767-786 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture makes great promises of better seeds, but also raises many controversies about ownership of seeds and about potential hazards. I suggest that owners of these seeds bear the responsibility to do no harm in using these seeds. After defining the nature of this responsibility, this paper asks, if ownership entails moral responsibility, and ownership can be transferred, then how is moral responsibility transferred? Building on the literature on use plans, I suggest five conditions for a good transfer of moral responsibility for genetically modified seeds. I also look at the Monsanto Technology Use Guide and Technology/Stewardship Agreement, as an examplar of a use plan, to explore the extent to which these conditions are present. I conclude that use plans can play a role in the distribution and transfer of moral responsibility for technologies with high benefits and potential harmful uncertainties.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Looking for Moral Responsibility in Ownership: A Way to Deal with Hazards of GMOs.Zoë Robaey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):43-56.
Incompatibilism and the transfer of non-responsibility.Justin A. Capes - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1477-1495.
Moral Responsibility, Authenticity, and Ownership.Matthew T. Flummer - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (3):525-538.
Agricultural technology, wealth, and responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
Conditions of Moral Responsibility.Gordon Pettit - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Technology as Responsibility: Failure, Food Animals, and Lab-grown Meat.Wyatt Galusky - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):931-948.
Optimism about Moral Responsibility.Jacob Barrett - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (33):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-03

Downloads
81 (#258,441)

6 months
12 (#294,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Actions Versus Functions.Wybo Houkes & Pieter Vermaas - 2004 - The Monist 87 (1):52-71.
Sharing in or Benefiting from Scientific Advancement?Cristian Timmermann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):111-133.
Responsibilities.Robert E. Goodin - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):50-56.
Bodily rights and property rights.B. Bjorkman - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (4):209-214.
Looking for Moral Responsibility in Ownership: A Way to Deal with Hazards of GMOs.Zoë Robaey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):43-56.

View all 7 references / Add more references