The Relevance of the Belmont Report to Research Using Animals

Journal of Animal Ethics 9 (1):84-103 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prejudice in the selection of the subjects of scientific research is morally unacceptable. Indeed, the occurrence of prejudice in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study prompted the production of the Belmont Report, setting out the basic ethical principles for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. The relevance of the Belmont Report to the protection of all animal subjects of scientific research is discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction to the Special Issue on the Belmont Report.Franklin G. Miller & Jonathan Kimmelman - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):219-219.
A Belmont Report for Animals?Hope Ferdowsian, L. Syd M. Johnson, Jane Johnson, Andrew Fenton, Adam Shriver & John Gluck - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):19-37.
Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.
The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):240-250.
Belmont in Context.Will Schupmann & Jonathan D. Moreno - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (2):220-239.
Beyond the Belmont Report.Wamia Siddiqui & Richard R. Sharp - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (10):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
11 (#1,422,077)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121.

Add more references