Does Liberalism Rest on a Mistake?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):231 - 251 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is becoming popular among contemporary philosophers to view liberalism as a political morality which rests on a fundamental moral requirement that persons are to be treated equally according to a certain conception of equal respect and concern. On this view, the liberal conception of equal respect and concern requires that conflicts of interests must be decided by appeal to principles which are rationally justifiable on grounds that are neutral or impartial between persons and their competing conceptions of the good life. Ronald Dworkin has expressed this view by contrasting liberalism with political moralities that are founded on conceptions of what constitutes treating persons equally which are ‘at least partly determined by some conception of the good life.‘

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberal Equality and the Justification of Multicultural, Civic Education.J. S. Andrews - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 7 (1):111-126.
Respect for persons and perfectionist politics.Thaddeus Metz - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (4):417–442.
Moral Agency, Commitment, and Impartiality.Neera K. Badhwar - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):1-26.
Liberalism, Justice and Markets.Colin Murray Macleod - 1993 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Liberalism and the Good Life.Alexandre Lefebvre - 2022 - Journal of Social and Political Philosophy 1 (2):152-168.
Discursive Equality and Public Reason.Thomas M. Besch - 2024 - In James Dominic Rooney & Patrick Zoll (eds.), Beyond Classical Liberalism: Freedom and the Good. New York, NY: Routledge Chapman & Hall. pp. 81-98.
Politics, Religion, and National Identity.Gordon Graham - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 45:73-84.
Autonomy, Want Satisfaction, and the Justification of Liberal Freedoms.Danny Scoccia - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):583 - 601.
Can Justice Be Really Ethically Neutral?Michal Sládeček - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (1):123-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#653,582)

6 months
10 (#430,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fairness to goodness.John Rawls - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (4):536-554.
Rawls on justice.Thomas Nagel - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):220-234.
Liberalism.Dworkin Ronald - 1978 - In Stuart Hampshire (ed.), Public and Private Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references