On the Embodiment of Space and Time: Triadic logic, quantum indeterminacy and the metaphysics of relativity

Abstract

Triadic (systemical) logic can provide an interpretive paradigm for understanding how quantum indeterminacy is a consequence of the formal nature of light in relativity theory. This interpretive paradigm is coherent and constitutionally open to ethical and theological interests. In this statement: (1) Triadic logic refers to a formal pattern that describes systemic (collaborative) processes involving signs that mediate between interiority (individuation) and exteriority (generalized worldview or Umwelt). It is also called systemical logic or the logic of relatives. The term "triadic logic" emphasizes that this logic involves mediation of dualities through an irreducibly triadic formalism. The term "systemical logic" emphasizes that this logic applies to systems in contrast to traditional binary logic which applies to classes. The term "logic of relatives" emphasizes that this logic is background independent (in the sense discussed by Smolin ). (2) An interpretive paradigm refers to a way of thinking that generates an understanding through concepts, their inter-relationships and their connections with experience. (3) Coherence refers to holistic integrity or continuity in the meaning of concepts that form an interpretation or understanding. (4) Constitutionally open refers to an inherent dependence in principle of an interpretation or understanding on something outside of a specific discipline's discourse or domain of inquiry (epistemic system). Interpretations that are constitutionally open are incomplete in themselves and open to responsive, interdisciplinary discourse and collaborative learning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Remarks on the origin and foundations of formalisation.Srećko Kovač - 2020 - In Marcin Będkowski, Anna Brożek, Alicja Chybińska, Stepan Ivanyk & Dominik Traczykowski (eds.), Formal and Informal Methods in Philosophy. Boston: Brill | Rodopi. pp. 163-179..
Scientific Philosophy.Gustavo E. Romero - 2018 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
An Application of Peircean Triadic Logic: Modelling Vagueness.Asim Raza, Asim D. Bakhshi & Basit Koshul - 2019 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28 (3):389-426.
Peirce's Triadic Logic: Modality and Continuity.Brent C. Odland - 2021 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57 (2):149-171.
Peirce’s Triadic Logic Revisited.Robert Lane - 1999 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (2):284 - 311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-08

Downloads
490 (#58,367)

6 months
126 (#42,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy M. Rogers
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leibnizian relationalism for general relativistic physics.Antonio Vassallo & Michael Esfeld - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (C):101-107.
The Architecture of Theories.Charles S. Peirce - 1891 - The Monist 1 (2):161-176.
Evolutionary love.Charles Sanders Peirce - 1893 - The Monist 3 (2):176-200.

View all 6 references / Add more references