Person and love in postmodern romanticism

Prometeica - Revista De Filosofía Y Ciencias 32 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis of continuity between Romanticism and postmodern thought has become a commonplace. It is based on the fact that both have the common denominator of irrationalism, opposed to the rationality of the Enlightenment. The debate about postmodernity is, at the same time, a discussion about the essence of the Enlightenment. Considering, in this context, the philosophical question of love, and its relationship with the concept of person, can provide important data for this analysis. It is proposed in these lines that the eros-agape dialectic, present in different forms both in Enlightenment and in Romanticism, is also notable in postmodern thought. This dialectic would be a particular aspect of another, broader one, which would explain the continuity in the difference between the Enlightenment, Romanticism and postmodernity. On the other hand, it is argued that this view of postmodernity can provide a series of keys to interpret some current phenomena.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,839

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-05

Downloads
1 (#1,958,838)

6 months
1 (#1,599,003)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juan Roldan
Universidad EAFIT

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references