Models and lawlikeness

Synthese 52 (2):313 - 323 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do analogical models ever play an essential role in scientific explanation and confirmation, or is their role (at most) heuristic? For many years scientists and philosophers have debated this question. I argue that such models may sometimes play an essential role. My argument is based on a proposal to augment Goodman''s theory of projection in order to make it easier for novel predicates (extensions) to acquire entrenchment. The heart of this proposal is the claim that analogical models may, under certain conditions, be the medium whereby entrenchment is passed from well established predicates to new and unfamiliar ones.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models and Explanation.Alisa Bokulich - 2017 - In Magnani Lorenzo & Bertolotti Tommaso Wayne (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer. pp. 103-118.
Models and Inferences in Science.Richard Dawid - 1st ed. 2016 - In Emiliano Ippoliti, Fabio Sterpetti & Thomas Nickles (eds.), Models and Inferences in Science. Cham: Springer. pp. 191-205.
Confirmation by analogy.Francesco Nappo - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-26.
Understanding (With) Toy Models.Alexander Reutlinger, Dominik Hangleiter & Stephan Hartmann - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axx005.
Constructing reality with models.Tee Sim-Hui - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4605-4622.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#376,360)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James E. Roper
Michigan State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references