Not all that strange: A response to Dreyfus and Spinosa

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):125 – 128 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dreyfus and Spinosa's 'Coping with Things-in-themselves' assumes that the line between the familiar and the strange coincides with the line between the 'for us' and the 'in itself'. But their opponents would urge that the familiar-strange distinction be dealt with pragmatically rather than ontologically.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The fragility of robust realism: A reply to Dreyfus and Spinosa.Jeff Malpas - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):89 – 101.
Dreyfus and Spinosa on things-in-themselves.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):115 – 124.
Practical incommensurability and the phenomenological basis of robust realism.Mark A. Wrathall - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):79 – 88.
Hoe vreemd is de vreemdeling voor het recht?H. Lindahl - 2002 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2:33-57.
Transiting the familiar and the strange.Tyson Koska - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):117 – 122.
Response to Dreyfus.John McDowell - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):366 – 370.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'coping' with professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#200,313)

6 months
7 (#749,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references