Commentary

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):378-380 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This tragic case raises two important ethical issues. One is the obvious problem of just allocation of scarce transplant organs. The other is the less obvious problem of the healthcare team's feelings of commitment to their patient. Together they present an unusual conflict for bioethics

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary.Joel Frader - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):376-377.
Commentary.Andrew Thurman - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):129-130.
Commentary.Ben A. Rich - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):100-104.
Commentary.David Lowenthal - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):423-425.
Commentary.Robert Gatter - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):377-378.
Commentary.Catherine A. Marco - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (4):425-428.
Commentary: Just Say “No”.Hervé Chneiweiss - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):701-704.
Commentary.Howard Klepper - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):213-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
15 (#1,238,350)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosamond Rhodes
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references