Double or nothing: Deconstructing cultural heritage

Chinese Semiotic Studies 11 (3):297-315 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper draws on the deconstruction(ist) toolbox and specifically on the textual unweaving tactics of supplementarity, exemplarity, and parergonality, with a view to critically assessing institutional (UNESCO’s) and ordinary tourists’ claims to authenticity as regards artifacts and sites of ‘cultural heritage’. Through the ‘destru[k]tion’ of claims to ‘originality’ and ‘myths of origin’, that function as preservatives for canning such artifacts and sites, the cultural arche-writing that forces signifiers to piously bow before a limited string of ‘transcendental signifieds’ is brought to full view. The stench of the aeons is thus forced to evaporate through a post-transcendentalist opening towards originary myths’ original doubles.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Truth of sincerity and authenticity or lie of reconstruction; whom do the visitors of cultural heritage trust?Hassan Bazazzadeh - 2020 - In Claudia Battaino, Agata Bonenberg, Armando Dal Fabbro, Nina Juzwa, Justyna Kobylarczyk, Gino Malacarne, Rafi Segal & Jan Słyk (eds.), DEFINING THE ARCHITECTURAL SPACE – THE TRUTH AND LIE OF ARCHITECTURE. pp. 7-18.
Tayabas City Colonial Era Cemeteries: A Local Cultural Heritage Site.Arvin Ypil - 2023 - Tala: An Online Journal of History 6 (2):52-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-19

Downloads
238 (#110,029)

6 months
57 (#96,104)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Rossolatos
Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references