Logical Consequence for Nominalists

Theoria 24 (2):147-168 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is often claimed that nominalistic programmes to reconstruct mathematics fail, since they will at some point involve the notion of logical consequence which is unavailable to the nominalist. In this paper we use an idea of Goodman and Quine to develop a nominalistically acceptable explication of logical consequence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,238

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of logic.Otávio Bueno - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff, Philosophies of the Sciences. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 39–67.
Logical Consequence: A Constructivist View.Dag Prawitz - 2005 - In Stewart Shapiro, Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Logical Pluralism.J. C. Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.
On the formalization of Strawson's presupposition.Jacek Malinowski - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
353 (#89,022)

6 months
22 (#155,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Daniel Cohnitz
Utrecht University
Marcus Rossberg
University of Connecticut